Skip to content skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Céline Pina.

FIGAROVOX / TRIBUNE – Faced with the controversy, the Civic Service Agency finally gave up entrusting young people to the “feminist and anti-racist” association Lallab. For Céline Pina, the State should clearly express the reasons for this refusal: this association defends ideas incompatible with the French Republic.


Former local elected official, Céline Pina is an essayist and activist. She had denounced in 2015 the salon of "the Muslim woman" of Pontoise and recently published Guilty Silence (Kero editions, 2016). With Fatiha Boutjalhat, she is the founder of Long live the Republic, secular and republican citizen movement calling to fight against all forms of totalitarianism and for the promotion of the essential universality of our republican values.


The "Lallab" association, which presents itself as "an association whose goal is to make heard the voices of Muslim women who are at the heart of racist and sexist oppression", is in fact part of these associations Islamism and which are the respectable facades of the diffusion of their unequal, obscurantist and deadly ideology. Close to the Muslim Brotherhood and the indigenists, this association which advocates Islamist feminism is opposed to the 2004 law against the veil and never ceases to shout down white feminism. The adjective "white" here aims to devalue the universal dimension of this fight, but above all it demonstrates how much race is the obsession of this whole movement.

For this association, the woman belongs first to her community and her only fight is to put her under house arrest in this membership. As indicated by Mathilde Lambert's rigorous investigation available on Ikhwan Info website : "Lallab, laboratory of Islamist feminism", the exemplary woman that Lallab takes as a model, Asma Lamrabet, is a pure product of the ideology of the Muslim Brotherhood. In the flagship book of the muse of the association, "Musulmane tout simples", the investigator of Ikhwan Info notes tasty passages where Asma Lamrabet, as a good propagandist, castigates the hysteria of women and defends the right of the husband to hit his wife. Lallab is also very close to an organizer of the decolonial camp forbidden to whites or to activists fighting against abortion, which does not seem to bother Family Planning, which in turn has just given its support, showing in broad daylight what many suspected in view of increasingly curious positions taken: like the League of Human Rights or the League of Education, Planning is also the object of the attention of the Muslim Brotherhood who broadcast there their ideology.

The heart of his fight is the submission of women under the influence of fundamentalist injunctions, but it goes better by calling it "freedom to wear the veil". The worst part is that it works...

Finally, from the feminist fight, the activists of Lallab reject everything: the right to dispose of one's body, sexual freedom, the right to abortion, the refusal to be reduced to a biological function, gender equality... For Lallab, feminism with an Islamist sauce means supporting macho, obscurantist and patriarchal injunctions under the guise of defending freedoms: the heart of her fight is the submission of women under the influence of fundamentalist injunctions, but that goes better in calling it "freedom to wear the veil". The worst part is that it works...

And it is to this association that the Civic Service Agency was preparing to allocate three positions to help it develop its activities. Faced with the outcry, the government agency finally backed down.

Intended to promote citizen engagement and strengthen national cohesion, the missions of the Civic Service Agency are supposed to be missions related to the general interest. One can doubt that an association, which confuses universalism and domination of the white race, which calls itself a feminist while rejecting all combats for the liberation of women and for which the pinnacle of self-affirmation is servility to the group and the integration of religious prohibitions, being the best example. Indeed, positions in civic service, paid in part by our taxes, represent a non-negligible help, both human, financial and moral: having them also shows that one is a recognized and legitimate interlocutor of the State.

One would not imagine providing people in civic service to the Indigenous Party of the Republic, which works to awaken "racial" hatred, treats the State as racist and the French as fascists. No more than one would consider equipping a pharmacy close to the extreme right. It would give them the means to spit on us by providing the saliva ourselves. It is the same for Lallab: it cannot have the support of a State whose leaders are undermining the foundations by refusing in fact equality between women and men and by firing symbolic bullets at our secularism and our Republic.

By dint of refusing to defend our principles, values ​​and ideals, certain leaders are in the process of financing the activities of those whose only ambition is to destroy what we are.

The Civic Service Agency would have grown by assuming these obvious facts and by being clear about the reasons for its refusal to provide this association with volunteers. It was even its symbolic role to recall that by highlighting race and rejecting universalism, one cannot participate in the expression of the general interest, nor do one's job as a citizen. But for that, too, it would have been necessary for the hour to be courageous. However, to see the embarrassment and hypocrisy of the Agency's communication: "the announcement has not been withdrawn but suspended", "we fear that this will make it possible to replace a salaried job...", even the embarrassment to invoke the religious nature of the association, we are not immune to people in civic service ending up working for this type of association and, instead of working for civil harmony, become active agents of segregation and separatism sought by the Muslim Brotherhood.

By dint of refusing to defend our principles, values ​​and ideals, certain leaders are in the process of financing the activities of those whose only ambition is to destroy what we are. That as a bonus we subsidize them for this is only further proof of the blindness of part of the elite, blindness which leads them to betray their mission: to protect and bring to life our republican ideal.

Here we are talking about an association whose facade of respectability is only there to allow the first steps towards radicalization to take place gently while even boasting of political legitimacy (if elected officials and government agencies subsidize, it is therefore that the activity and the objectives are recognized). The veiling of women is not anecdotal in the politics of the Muslim Brotherhood, it is at the heart of their matrix: it marks their hold on bodies, heads and territories.

We can therefore wonder about the influence and success of an association which, barely founded in 2016, sent its activists on TV sets in front of Prime Minister Manuel Valls, was entitled to laudatory articles from the World, La Croix, receives the "Coexist" prize from the hands of Jean-Louis Bianco, is assigned part of the parliamentary reserve of Esther Benbassa...

Some useful idiots are turning more and more into active traitors and are not innocent of the extent of Islamist infiltration that this kind of affair shows us.

It seems that the Islamists have connections at the highest level of the media and power so that, barely created and without a very substantial balance sheet, Lallab has been so highlighted: the association has even intervened in high schools, which does not is not given to everyone. This questions the penetration of the enemies of our Republic at the highest level of influence and gives us the right to hold our political representation to account. Like also noticing that some useful idiots are turning more and more into active traitors and are not innocent of the extent of Islamist infiltration that this kind of affair shows us. You have to see them take up the defense of the association by accusing the Civic Service Agency of having yielded to the ukases of the fachosphere, certain journalists collaborating without difficulty in the dissemination of this false information, whereas the reaction came before everything from the secular and republican sphere. But to silence these lucid and disturbing voices, the trial in fascism has long been effective, why abandon such a martingale?

The Muslim Brotherhood through their allies are putting enormous pressure on the Civic Service Agency to reverse their decision. The refusal to grant them personnel in civic service can become a blow to the institutionalization of their subsidiaries if it is the first salvo of the regained honor of the Republic. So how long will we continue to be victims of the negligence of our leaders, of their refusal to attack the propaganda offices of political Islam? Fighting against radicalization starts here: denying subsidies and legitimacy to associations that do not respect the spirit of our laws and our constitution and that attack what founds us as a Nation. And we must do it proudly, assume the symbolic charge of this policy by clearly stating the causes of this refusal: this is how we bring into being the principles that make us a people and how we rearm the Republican speech. This is what the Civic Service Agency has not been able to do, this is what too many of our elected officials refuse to do, this is what a government still does not do, which for being new is sadly similar to the precedent on these issues. But this abandonment of their mission of protection by our representatives makes us targets, a soft underbelly which it is hardly costly to attack.




Source: © Le Figaro Premium – Céline Pina: “The State must clearly denounce the Lallab association, a laboratory of Islamism”

Leave a comment

CJFAI © 2023. All Rights Reserved.