---

Former local elected official, Céline Pina is an essayist and activist. In 2015, she denounced the “Muslim woman” show in Pontoise and recently published Silence Coupable (Kero editions, 2016). With Fatiha Boutjalhat, she is the founder of Viv(r)e la République, a secular and republican citizen movement calling for the fight against all forms of totalitarianism and for the promotion of the essential universality of our republican values.

---

At the University of Lyon 2 will be held, this October 14, 2017, one of these conferences of which the indigenists of the PIR (Party of the natives of the Republic) and the Islamists, Muslim Brotherhood version have the secret. Entitled “Fighting against Islamophobia, an issue of equality?”, the workshops target secularism, “State Islamophobia”, religious intolerance.

Participants and organizers: Islamist and indigenist nebula, university guarantee

Among the organizers, we find, among others, professionals of Islamist entryism and destabilization, linked to the Muslim Brotherhood: the CCIF, the EMF, CRI and PSM.

Among the organizers, we find, among others, professionals of Islamist entryism and destabilization, linked to the Muslim Brotherhood: this is the case of the CCIF (Collective against Islamophobia), the EMF (Muslim Students of France), CRI (Coordination against racism and Islamophobia).

As for the PSM association "Muslim Participation and Spirituality", also announced as present at this conference, it distinguished itself for having employed a recruiter of jihadists in Lunel, who was worried in 2015 for having sent 20 young French people to Syria. !

Among the participants, we quickly identify the usual university alibi of the Islamists: François Burgat, very close to Tariq Ramadan. He supported the FIS in Algeria, denying the massive use of violence by the Islamists in defiance of all reality and praised the merits of the Iranian regime.

The man often stands alongside the UOIF, the Muslim Brotherhood party, when it comes to testifying in the context of judicial jihad. There are also the usual doctoral students posing as recognized experts or teachers whose work shines neither by abundance, nor by influence, nor by scientific quality.

Worse. Characters such as Abdelaziz Chaambi, former leader of the Indigenous peoples are highlighted.

More serious. Are highlighted characters like Abdelaziz Chaambi, former leader of the Indigenous Peoples of the Republic of Lyon, and who is incidentally on file S.

of the Lyon Republic, founder of Tawhid editions (which publish the propaganda of the Muslim Brotherhood) and who is incidentally on file with S.

Add to the party, Jamila Farah, head of the CRI, which militates against the 2004 law on religious symbols in schools, wants to restore blasphemy and whose association to which she belongs prides itself on being close to the brothers Ramadan and Hassan Iquioussen.

She ran for the legislative elections under the label of the Equality Justice Party, the French branch of the Islamist party of Turkish President Erdogan. Which PEJ claims a moratorium on secularism, the prohibition of blasphemy, the veil at school, the fight against libertinage which would characterize French society and defends communitarianism.

Let's also look at the delicious Souhail Chichah, also a teacher at Lyon 2, a supporter of censorship when it is not he who has the floor. He did not hesitate to make the punch in order to prevent Caroline Fourest from holding a conference within the Free University of Brussels, university in which he was professor! Of course, this is not invented, within the framework of the colloquium, he intervenes to complain about the intolerance suffered by the religious.

Let's finish with Ismahane Chouder, a member of the Moroccan Islamist party Al Adl Wal Ihsane, this pro-veil activist is one of the spokespersons for the Dignity March, which brought together far-left racists around the call for "the struggle races»: it advocates non-mixing and separatism. And it is to this areopagus that the President of the Observatory of Secularism associates his name.

Thus endorsing the fact that in France one can be a bridgehead for obscurantism, anti-secular, sexist, even be on file S and have the honors of the academy, the recognition of the media, the political world and the senior civil service.

Funny colloquium, funny speakers and funny workshops

In fact, what we do best as personalities from racist and sexist movements, spreading propaganda and a violent and totalitarian vision of the world, is brought together.

The introductory text of this colloquium is a good example of the cat's porridge produced by double talk. We learn there that the assassination of the journalists of Charlie and the waves of attacks which we knew had only one consequence: the explosion of “Islamophobia” But it is false.

The assaults were rather marginal. It talks about uniting academic research and human rights activism; but, in fact, what we do best as personalities from racist and sexist movements, spreading propaganda and a violent and totalitarian vision of the world, is gathered.

And, the most shocking still remains that they will find no opponents in front of them. All stakeholders will go in the same direction.

At the opening of this conference on Islamophobia, the first workshop raises the question of secularism in our Republic.

One could wonder about the direct relationship thus created between secularism and Islamophobia, but for all those who know the ideology of the Indigenous Peoples of the Republic and the Muslim Brotherhood, we are there at the heart of the

We are there at the heart of the doctrine: eliminating secularism or invoking its form in order to better betray it in substance and make it the protective society of religions, when it is indifferent to them.

doctrine: to eliminate secularism or invoke its form in order better to betray it in substance and make it the protective society of religions, when it is indifferent to them (it does not recognize them, it protects their free exercise, which is very different) and that it is a tool for the emancipation of the individual and society, not a law of concord.

Second workshop: Can we speak of state Islamophobia?

There we pinch ourselves. We are supposed to be in the presence also of academics for whom the concepts make sense.

But state racism has a precise definition: it creates apartheid societies where the difference in rights depending on whether you are dominant or dominated is enshrined in law. One of the most telling marks concerns the prohibition of marriages in the name of purity of race or belonging.

Many of the militants of political Islam who intervene in this colloquium are Algerian, they know that their country prohibits marriages between Muslims and non-Muslims. If they want to fight against state racism, they have a fine example, real and not fantasized.

In addition to the lack of intellectual rigor perceptible from the naming of the workshops, this symposium, a veritable staging of the influence of the Islamist and separatist far left, takes place in a charged context: Robert Faurisson, emblematic figure of Holocaust denial and great friend de Dieudonné was a lecturer at Lyon 2 and succeeded in subverting Lyon 3, considered for a time as a den of Holocaust denial in France.

At the time, the refusal of university authorities to assume their responsibilities had already allowed that, during the defense of theses, historical falsification received the academic anointing.

Yet this anointing of the University is decisive in legitimizing a word, the one who carries it and the ideology that

Tariq Ramadan was offered a chair at Oxford for one reason only: to present himself as an academic reinforces his credibility and makes him acceptable as an interlocutor for the public authorities.

underpins it. Tariq Ramadan, who is not an academic, was offered a chair at Oxford for one reason: to present himself as an academic reinforces his credibility and makes him more acceptable as an interlocutor for public authorities.

The title he claims is an imposture, but since Oxford allows things to happen and outside this gives false scientific validity to purely ideological positions, he would be wrong to deprive himself of it.

We can only deplore the attitude of Lyon 2 University, which should have learned from its own history and refused to allow an extremist political demonstration to take place within its walls, disguised as scientific communication.

We can only wonder about the governance of this university, when we know that at the head of this maneuver is the vice-president in charge of equality and civic life, Yannick Chevalier.

We would also like to hear the president of Lyon 2, Nathalie Dompnier on this subject, does she endorse this Islamist rout or not? If not, will she have the courage to cancel it?

One can only wonder about the laxity of the Prefecture and the university authorities which let an S file intervene on the platform without asking the question of the risk of disturbing public order. Especially since on the prefecture side, this detail could not be ignored.

Another scandal is the reading of Jean-Louis Bianco's communication. Whatever the content, the damage is already done: its presence in the program legitimizes its content and transforms a host of haters into interlocutors of the public authorities.

It recognizes those who hate France and slaps all those who defend secularism. It is all the more unforgivable that the man is accustomed to the fact. His extremely accommodating and purely legal vision of secularism caused the resignation of the Observatory of authentic republicans such as Jean Glavany, Françoise Laborde and Patrick Kessel.

If for Emmanuel Macron secularism really means something, then the sanction must fall. Quickly and permanently.

Let's not forget either the attacks of the Observatory brought against Elisabeth Badinter or Manuel Valls. When a man betrays the mission entrusted to him and is tirelessly reappointed, it says a lot about the true intentions of the power he serves.

If this were not the case, however, if for Emmanuel Macron secularism really means something, then the sanction must fall. Quickly and permanently. Otherwise, the pun on Jean-Louis Bianco, President of the slaughterhouse of secularism, will then take on its full meaning.

---